Atik v. Welch Foods, Inc., No. 15cv5405 (E.D.N.Y.): Putative class action alleging claims under New York and California consumer protection laws, as well as claims for breaches of express and implied warranty and unjust enrichment, claiming that Defendants’ fruit snacks are misbranded and misrepresented as containing more fruit than they actually contain. Complaint.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al. v. Whole Foods, Inc., No. 15cv4301 (N.D. Cal.): Putative class action on behalf of consumers and PETA alleging claims under California’s UCL, FAL, and CLRA, alleging that although Whole Foods represents that it has a five-step rating system for sourcing meat products and that its meat suppliers meet high standards for animal treatment, these representations are false because the standards are meaningless and not rigorously enforced. Complaint.
Kincaid v. XO Health Co., No 1522-cc10662 (St. Louis Circuit Ct. Mo.): Putative class action alleging a claim under Missouri’s consumer protection statute and unjust enrichment, claiming that Defendant’s baking mix products are misrepresented as being “all natural” when in fact they contain sodium acid pyrophosphate (SAPP). Complaint.
Continue Reading New Filings for October, 16, 2015