Victor v. R.C. Bigelow, Inc., No. 3:13-cv-2976 (N.D. Cal.) and Khasin v. R.C. Bigelow Inc., No. 3:12-cv-2204 (N.D. Cal.): United States District Judge William H. Orrick granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, disposing of this putative class action asserting violations of California’s UCL, CLRA, and FAL, and raising a claim for unjust enrichment.  Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint alleged that Defendant made unlawful health, nutrient content, and antioxidant claims on the packaging of its tea products.  The Court had previously denied Plaintiff’s motion for class certification, after finding Plaintiff lacked standing and concluding Plaintiff’s proposed methods of calculating damages were meritless.  We previously reported on these cases here.